Cases 11 - 20 of 68
Meyers v. Chief Judge et al
as 5:2022ct03011
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Chief Judge, James N. Ishida, Judge Terrence Boyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fuller v. Honeycutt et al
as 1:2021cv00348
Plaintiff:
Johnathan A. Fuller
Defendant:
R. Honeycutt, James Waldroop, Landon Browning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. United States of America et al
as 5:2020ct03301
Defendant:
Terrence W. Boyle, Vince M. Rozier, Jr., Joshua Stein and others
Plaintiff:
David L. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Witham v. Boyle et al
as 5:2020cv00446
Defendant:
The GSA, New York State, State of Vermont and others
Plaintiff:
Judson Witham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Witham v. United States Government et al
as 5:2020cv00385
Plaintiff:
Judson Witham
Defendant:
International Paper and Power Inc., 1 - 10 (Bivens Action), Basil Seggos and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Witham v. Boyle et al
as 5:2020cv00330
Defendant:
The GSA, Terrence Boyle, New York State and others
Plaintiff:
Judson Witham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BOYLES v. LANGMORE CAPITAL, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00545
Defendant:
EQUITY TRUST COMPANY and LANGMORE CAPITAL, LLC
Plaintiff:
CARLTON T. BOYLES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ESTATE OF DORLA EVANS BOYLES et al v. GREE USA, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv00276
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF DORLA EVANS BOYLES and PATRICK BOYLES
Defendant:
MJC AMERICA, LTD, GREE ELECTRIC APPLIANCES, INC. OF ZHUHAI, GREE USA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gould v. USA et al
as 3:2020cv00167
Defendant:
Terrence W. Boyle, Peter Moore, Jr., Louise Flanagan and others
Plaintiff:
Salim Abdu Gould
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Boyle et al
as 5:2019hc02207
Respondent:
Bryan K. Wells and Terrence W. Boyle
Petitioner:
David L. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
