Cases 11 - 20 of 15,269
Miller v. Dunn
as 24-10500
Plaintiff:
Bradley B. Miller
Defendant:
Virginia Talley Dunn, Individually, Andrea Plumlee, In both Individual and Official Capacities, Danielle Diaz, In both Individual and Official Capacities and others
Harvey v. CDCR San Quentin State Prison et al
as 5:2024cv03392
Plaintiff:
Leone Renee Harvey
Defendant:
CDCR San Quentin State Prison, Ron Bloomfield and Ralph Diaz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04697
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Anthony Diaz v. Nordstrom, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv04670
Plaintiff:
Anthony Diaz
Defendant:
Nordstrom, Inc., a Washington corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Benitez-Diaz, Alberto et al v. Emmerich, E.
as 3:2024cv00369
Petitioner:
Alberto Benitez-Diaz, Cesar Serrano-Nieto, Jairo Salazar-Dominguez and others
Respondent:
Warden E. Emmerich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
USA v. Diaz Borrome, et al
as 24-2039
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ESTEBAN RAFAEL DIAZ BORROME, also known as Esteban Rafael Borrome Diaz, BEN CARRASQUILLOSANTO, JONATHAN FERNANDEZ MONTESINO and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv22109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Diaz v. D'Angel Auto Body Repair, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04220
Plaintiff:
Roberto Diaz
Defendant:
Dangel Auto Body Repair, Inc. (Dba Flat Fix Tires),, 149 Auto Body Repair Corp, and Juan Lantigua
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 021
Andrade Gutierrez et al v. Reilly
as 1:2024cv03953
Plaintiff:
Maria Elena Andrade Gutierrez, Joan Miguel Diaz Rodriguez and Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.
Defendant:
Edward Reilly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
