Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Gillam v. Robinson et al
as 2:2017cv12480
Plaintiff:
Michael Gillam
Defendant:
Alvin Robinson, James Still, F Cali and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mazique v. Robinson et al
as 2:2017cv06675
Plaintiff:
Timothy J Mazique
Defendant:
Alvin Robinson
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lucien Bazly v. Alvin Robinson, Warden
as 17-30508
Petitioner - Appellant:
LUCIEN P. BAZLY
Respondent - Appellee:
ALVIN ROBINSON, WARDEN, NELSON COLEMAN CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Belvin v. Champagne, et al
as 2:2017cv01776
Plaintiff:
Anthony Belvin
Defendant:
Greg Champagne , Alvin Robinson , Unidentified Parties and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Kelly et al
as 5:2016cv00233
Plaintiff:
Alvin Robinson
Defendant:
Wendy Kelly , Dexter L Payne , Joe Page, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alvin Robinson v. Wendy Kelley
as 15-2714
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Alvin Robinson
Defendant - Appellee:
Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Bartholomew v. Ladreyt et al
as 2:2014cv01468
Plaintiff:
Lance Garrett Bartholomew
Defendant:
Roland Ladreyt, Alvin Robinson, Jessica Troxclair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Hobbs
as 5:2013cv00214
Plaintiff:
Alvin Robinson
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Casey et al v. Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00655
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Casey , Charlotte Casey , Harry Ishihara and others
Defendant:
Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. , Gay & Robinson, Inc. , Robinson Family Partners and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Torts to Land
Williams v. Champagne et al
as 2:2011cv00160
Plaintiff:
Damon Floyd Williams
Defendant:
Greg Champagne , Roland LaDryet , Daniel Levet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
