Cases 1 - 10 of 26
James-Irvin et al v. Buffalo Police Department, et al
as 2:2023cv01237
Plaintiff:
Keita M. James-Irvin, William W. Morris Jr. and Jazmin Morris
Defendant:
Buffalo Police Department, Alvin Robinson, Pete Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reynolds v. Robinson
as 23-30923
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Michael Reynolds
Respondent:
Alvin Robinson, Warden, Nelson Coleman Correctional Center and Louisiana State
Reynolds v. Robinson
as 23-30847
Petitioner / Appellant:
Jeffrey Michael Reynolds
Respondent / Appellee:
Alvin Robinson, Warden, Nelson Coleman Correctional Center and Louisiana State
JAMES-IRVIN v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2023cv01961
Plaintiff:
KEITA M JAMES-IRVIN and KEITA M. JAMES-IRVIN
Defendant:
1017 Records, STACY ABRAMS, ASCAP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
ROBINSON v. CITY OF GREENSBORO et al
as 1:2022cv00897
Plaintiff:
ALVIN ROBINSON
Defendant:
CITY OF GREENSBORO, Christian A Wilson, Jemiah K Waterman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Robinson v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 8:2022cv00687
Plaintiff:
Alvin Robinson
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Alexander v. Robinson
as 2:2021cv01299
Plaintiff:
Dwight Anthony Alexander, Sr
Defendant:
Alvin Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mazique v. Robinson
as 21-30319
Petitioner / Appellant:
Timothy J. Mazique
Respondent / Appellee:
Alvin Robinson, Warden
Sawyer v. Charles et al
as 2:2021cv00482
Defendant:
Amber Gros, Durante, Alvin Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Caleb Sawyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mazique v. Robinson et al
as 2:2020cv02695
Plaintiff:
Timothy J Mazique
Defendant:
Alvin Robinson
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
