Cases 11 - 20 of 178
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05554
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Lopez v. S E Pipeline Construction Company et al
as 3:2023cv01228
Plaintiff:
Juan Angel Lopez
Defendant:
S E Pipeline Construction Company and Does 1-50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 lm Removal- Labor/Mgmt. Relations
LOPEZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv10403
Plaintiff:
ANGEL LOPEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lopez v. City of Wyandotte, City of, et al
as 2:2023cv11059
Plaintiff:
ANGEL LOPEZ
Defendant:
City of Wyandotte, Detecitve Joseph Carr, Officer AARON WORLEY and others
(HC) Martinez Lopez v. Warden
as 2:2023cv00773
Petitioner:
Angel Lopez Martinez and Angel Martinez Lopez
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Herlong and Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Johnson v. Nunez et al
as 2:2023cv00087
Plaintiff:
Alex Bernard Johnson
Defendant:
Juan J. Nunez, Jerry J. Sanchez, Placido Samaniego and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Nunez et al
as 1:2023cv00051
Plaintiff:
Alex Bernard Johnson
Defendant:
Juan J. Nunez, Jerry J. Sanchez, Placido Samaniego and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Velez (Woods)
as 23-6254
Defendant:
CARMELO VELEZ, CHRISTOPHER RODRIGUEZ, LUIS SEPULVEDA and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MARK WOODS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv06022
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
