Cases 11 - 20 of 58
George Vargas v. R. Brown
as 23-7265
Petitioner / Appellant:
GEORGE ANTONIO VARGAS
Respondent / Appellee:
R. BROWN, Warden
Vargas Jr. v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv01006
Plaintiff:
Antonio Vargas, Jr.
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Vargas v. Brown
as 3:2023cv00070
Petitioner:
George Antonio Vargas
Respondent:
R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Vargas Trejo v. Garland
as 22-1991
Petitioner:
JUAN ANTONIO VARGAS TREJO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Sunil Kumar, Ph. D. et al v. Dr. Jolene Koester et al
as 2:2022cv07550
Plaintiff:
SUNIL KUMAR, Ph. D. and PRAVEEN SINHA, Ph. D.
Defendant:
DR. JOLENE KOESTER, in her official capacity as Chancellor of California State University,, LARRY L. ADAMSON, DIEGO ARAMBULA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2022cv81445
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Vargas v. Bradford et al
as 9:2022cv00888
Plaintiff:
Antonio Vargas
Defendant:
Bradford, Harrington, Lovely and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vargas v. Kessler et al
as 9:2022cv00862
Plaintiff:
Antonio Vargas
Defendant:
C.O. Kessler, Derocco, John Doe #6 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vargas v. LaValley et al
as 9:2022cv00806
Plaintiff:
Antonio Vargas
Defendant:
LaValley, C.O. Kelly, Duray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gomez et al v. Epic Landscape Productions, L.C.
as 2:2022cv02198
Plaintiff:
Jose Gonzalez Gomez, Adrian Margarito Lopez-Arenas, Alfonso Navaez-Uscanga and others
Defendant:
Epic Landscape Productions, Inc., Epic Landscape Prductions and Epic Landscape Productions, L.C.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
