Cases 11 - 20 of 96
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv03262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Hawley v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 8:2022cv00270
Plaintiff:
Adam Hawley
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Tharp v. Fremont Beef Company
as 8:2022cv00181
Plaintiff:
Adam S. Tharp
Defendant:
Fremont Beef Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Francis v. Kijakazi
as 8:2022cv00169
Plaintiff:
Adam Francis
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Roth et al v. Austin et al
as 4:2022cv03038
Plaintiff:
Tanner W. Roth, Jon W. Smithley, Logan M. Priebe and others
Defendant:
Lloyd J. Austin, III, United States Department of Defense, Frank Kendall, III and others
Roth et al v. Austin et al
as 8:2022cv03038
Plaintiff:
Tanner W. Roth, Jon W. Smithley, Logan M. Priebe and others
Defendant:
Lloyd J. Austin, III, United States Department of Defense, Frank Kendall, III and others
Tucker v. BNSF Railway Co.
as 7:2022cv05000
Plaintiff:
Robert Adam Tucker
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Co.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Commercial Resins Company, Inc. v Adams Industries, Inc., et al
as 8:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
COMMERCIAL RESINS COMPANY, INC.
Defendant:
ADAMS INDUSTRIES, INC., ADAMS WAREHOUSING, LLC, ADAMS LOGISTICS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Keup v. Sarpy County et al
as 8:2021cv00312
Plaintiff:
Adam Keup
Defendant:
Sarpy County, Jeff Davis and Jane or John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
