Cases 11 - 20 of 478
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00873
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
TORRES et al v. INDIANA FAMILY AND SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION et al
as 1:2024cv00855
Defendant:
ERIN HALL, INDIANA STATEWIDE INDEPENDENT LIVING COUNCIL, INC., AMBER O'HAVER and others
Plaintiff:
EVERYBODY COUNTS, INC., TERESA L TORRES and LESLIE L HAWKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MARTIN v. BRIDGES et al
as 1:2024cv00793
Plaintiff:
MARK L. MARTIN, II
Defendant:
CLARENCE BRIDGES, MICHAEL CECIL, BRENDA FELIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Christenson Copeland et al
as 3:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
Jerry A Smith and Jerry Antwon Smith
Defendant:
J Christenson Copeland, M Wala, Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. BRIDGES et al
as 1:2024cv00487
Plaintiff:
MARK L. MARTIN, II
Defendant:
CHARLES BRIDGES, MICHAEL CECIL, BRENDA FELIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURRITT v. EMERSON et al
as 1:2024cv00407
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BURRITT
Defendant:
EMERSON, AMY ROLLINGS and DAWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WINDERS v. OLSEN
as 3:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM WINDERS
Defendant:
AMY OLSEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
WINDERS v. OLSEN
as 1:2024cv00350
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM WINDERS
Defendant:
AMY OLSEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Martin v. Forest River, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
Amy Sue Martin
Defendant:
Forest River, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
