Cases 11 - 20 of 26
BARRY v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 2:2015cv04543
Plaintiff:
CHERYL ANN BARRY
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, LLC and JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Eric Michael Sorenson v. Minnesota Department of Human, et al
as 15-2236
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Eric Michael Sorenson
Defendant - Appellee:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, ("MDHS"), Minnesota Sex Offender Program, ("MSOP"), Lucinda Jesson and others
Graphenteen v. Jesson et al
as 0:2015cv02503
Plaintiff:
John Graphenteen
Defendant:
Lucinda Jesson, Anne Barry, Nancy Johnston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sorenson v. Minnesota Department of Human Services ("MDHS") et al
as 0:2015cv01573
Plaintiff:
Eric Michael Sorenson
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services ("MDHS"), Minnesota Sex Offender Program ("MSOP"), Lucinda Jesson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greene v. Ninneman et al
as 0:2014cv03458
Plaintiff:
Guy Israel Greene
Defendant:
Brian Ninneman, Jason Johnson, Tom Maciej and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Minor et al
as 2:2014cv00059
Plaintiff:
Luther W. Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
Lee Ann Barry and Maxie Schrupf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sorenson v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2014cv00470
Plaintiff:
Eric Michael Sorenson
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, Minnesota Sex Offender Program, The Institute For Psychological & Sexual Health, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barry v. Moham
as 6:2013cv00040
Petitioner:
Michelle Ann Barry
Respondent:
Rickey Moham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lori Ann Barry v. Michael J Astrue
as 5:2011cv01657
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Plaintiff:
Lori Ann Barry
Machen v. Iverson et al
as 0:2011cv01557
Plaintiff:
James Allen Machen
Defendant:
Scott Iverson, Patricia Patton, Daniel Klein and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3731
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
