Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Michael Peterson v. USDC-CALA
as 21-70872
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MICHAEL ANTHONY PETERSON and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ANTHONY PETERSON
PETERSON v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY et al
as 2:2021cv01165
Defendant:
ABC CORPORATIONS, OFFICER JEISON MARTINEZ, OFFICER MOHAMED J SAHEED and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY PETERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Peterson v. Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings
as 1:2020cv01056
Plaintiff:
Anthony Peterson
Defendant:
Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings doing business as Labcorp Diagnostics
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
PETERSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv91724
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY PETERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PETERSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv43473
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY PETERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
(HC) Peterson v. Diaz
as 2:2019cv01480
Petitioner:
Richard Anthony Peterson
Respondent:
Ralph M. Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PETERSON v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2018cv06702
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW ANTHONY PETERSON
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Phillip Peterson v. Shawn Hatton
as 18-70039
Petitioner:
PHILLIP ANTHONY PETERSON
Respondent:
SHAWN HATTON, Warden
Peterson v. Hatton
as 2:2017cv00785
Petitioner:
Phillip Anthony Peterson
Respondent:
S. Hatton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
US v. John Peterson
as 15-7180
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN ANTHONY PETERSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
