Cases 11 - 20 of 100
Sandford v. Constable et al
as 3:2026cv02015
Plaintiff:
Floyd Sandford
Defendant:
David E Constable, John C Regan, Joseph L Brennan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Duree v. Bennett et al
as 2:2026cv01957
Plaintiff:
Dominic Duree
Defendant:
Brian Bennett, John and Jane Doe, Allison J. Farrell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Aldana et al v. Shaikhet al
as 8:2026cv01745
Plaintiff:
Miguel Aldana, Daniel Banachowski, Thomas Beckum and others
Defendant:
Zan Shaikh and Bright Vision Distribution, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0077 Securities Fraud
Anderson et al. v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2026sf65099
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Anderson, John Ball, Michael Bass and others
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior Solutions Inc. and Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc. f/k/a MonoSol RX, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Filing Error
as 1:2026sf65097
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Anderson, John Ball, Michael Bass and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BENNETT v. COURENTE et al
as 1:2026cv01268
Plaintiff:
NALAKEIO L. BENNETT and Nalakeio Laguon Bennett
Defendant:
KELLY COURENTE, MCCAFFERTY, MANNING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Speer, et al.
as 26-3856
Petitioner:
WENDELL MAURICE CLARK
Respondent:
SCOTT SPEER and JASON BENNETT
Rosenbaum v. Bennett et al
as 1:2026cv01257
Plaintiff:
Aimee Lynn Rosenbaum
Defendant:
K Bennett, E Walters, C Newman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
BENNETT v. BISIGNANO
as 1:2026cv01266
Plaintiff:
AMBER LYNN BENNETT
Defendant:
FRANK BISIGNANO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Scarborough v. Bennett et al
as 4:2026cv02313
Plaintiff:
Matthew Paul Scarborough
Defendant:
LT. Bennett and Sergant Oneil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
