Cases
Cases 11 - 18 of 18
LANDAN et al v. WAL-MART REAL ESTATE BUSINESS TRUST et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00926
Plaintiff: LINDA LANDAN , HOLLY AND LINDSAY, LLC , JEFFREY J. SIKIRICA and others
Defendant: WAL-MART REAL ESTATE BUSINESS TRUST , WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP , WAL-MART STORES, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Romious v. Brooks and Associates, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv03033
Plaintiff: Carlos Romious
Defendant: Brooks and Associates, Inc., Chris Brooks, Thomas Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Romious v. Cornell et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv02791
Plaintiff: Carlos Romious
Defendant: Brian Cornell, Brooks and Associates, Inc./Realtors, Chris Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kortlander et al v. Cornell et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00155
Plaintiff: Christopher Kortlander , Historical Rarities and The Custer Battlefield Museum
Defendant: Brian Cornell, Bart Fitzgerald, Doug Goessman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Azael Dythian Perales v. Wal-Mart Inc et al
as 2:2009cv06452
Plaintiff: Azael Dythian Perales
Defendant: Wal-Mart Inc, Mike Drake, Sam's Club Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Raymond Robinson v. David Rubin, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-56379
Plaintiff - Appellant: RAYMOND ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee: DAVID RUBIN and BRIAN CORNELL
Robinson v. Rubin et al
as 3:2008cv00244
Plaintiff: Raymond Robinson
Defendant: David Rubin and Brian Cornell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cornell v. Canarecci Jr et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2007cv00574
Estate Plaintiff: Gregory Brian Cornell
Defendant: Sheriff Frank Canarecci Jr, Sargent R Olmstead, Chief Botich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?