Cases
Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv03788
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2012cv00327
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Capo et al v. Peterson et al
as 3:2011cv00567
Plaintiff: James A. Capo and Richard P. Hughes
Defendant: Central Peterson, Jr. and Barbara Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
Peterson v. The New York City Dept. of Corrections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv07283
Plaintiff: Barbara Peterson
Defendant: The New York City Dept. of Corrections, Larry W. David, N.A. Velasquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peterson v. The Housing Authority of The City of Fort Myers (HACFM)
as 2:2009cv00340
Plaintiff: Barbara Peterson
Defendant: The Housing Authority of The City of Fort Myers (HACFM)
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Type: Labor Plaintiff
Peterson et al v. Mentor Corporation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2007cv00135
Plaintiff: Barbara Peterson, Barbara Peterson, Barbara Peterson and others
Defendant: Mentor Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ATHERTON et al v. REGENERATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 1:2007cv01211
Plaintiff: CHARLES ATHERTON, CATHERINE HALE, BARBARA PETERSON and others
Defendant: REGENERATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC., MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK USA, INC. and BIOMEDICAL TISSUE SERVICES, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RAY et al v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2004cv01457
Plaintiff: MARTIN CHAMBERLIN , CAROL CHAMBERLIN , CRAIG OWENS and others
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?