Cases 11 - 20 of 43
Gomez v. Guevara et al
as 1:2018cv03335
Plaintiff:
Ariel Gomez
Defendant:
Reynaldo Guevara, Berscott Ruiz, Alan Pergande and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Sierra v. Guevara et al
as 1:2018cv03029
Plaintiff:
Thomas Sierra
Defendant:
Reynaldo Guevara, Ernest Halvorsen, Anthony Wojcik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Solache v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2018cv02312
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Solache
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Reynaldo Guevara, Robert Rutherford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Floodbreak, LLC v. Art Metal Industries, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv00503
Plaintiff:
Floodbreak, LLC
Defendant:
Art Metal Industries, LLC and Kevin F. Biebel
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
DeLeon-Reyes v. Guevara et al
as 1:2018cv01028
Plaintiff:
Arturo DeLeon-Reyes
Defendant:
Reynaldo Guevara, Ernest Halvorsen, Edwin Dickinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willis v. Illinois Dept of Corrections et al
as 3:2016cv01145
Plaintiff:
Maceo G Willis, Jr
Defendant:
Illinois Dept. of Corrections, Julius Flagg, Bart Toennis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willis v. Illinois Dept of Corrections et al
as 4:2016cv04155
Plaintiff:
Maceo G Willis, Jr
Defendant:
Illinois Dept of Corrections, Julius Flagg, Bart Toennis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Lewis v. USA, et al
as 16-2124
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES D. LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THOMAS J. DART, PAUL P. BIEBEL, JR., Chief, Cook County Circuit Court, Criminal Division and others
Lewis v. United States Of America et al.
as 3:2016cv50085
Plaintiff:
James D. Lewis
Defendant:
United States of America , Tom Dart, Biebel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BIEBEL v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2016cv00090
Plaintiff:
BARBARA L. BIEBEL
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
