Cases 11 - 20 of 207
Brooks et al v. Greystar Real Estate Partners, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv01729
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Brooks, Laura Siegel, Tiffany Vinson and others
Defendant:
Greystar Real Estate Partners, LLC, Greystar California, Inc., 100 Altair, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 dtp Diversity - Deceptive Trade Practices
Hall v. NYS DOCCS et al
as 9:2023cv01009
Plaintiff:
Murray Hall, III
Defendant:
NYS DOCCS, Scott Hurteau, Randy Blais and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Bruno et al
as 3:2023cv50284
Plaintiff:
Harlis Woods
Defendant:
Major Bruno, Officer Harvey, Officer Blais and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowen v. Blais et al
as 6:2023cv01088
Plaintiff:
Kathleen I Bowen and Kathleen I. Bowen
Defendant:
Aaron Blais, Matthew Stubbs, Dennis M Lemma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blais v. Holiday CVS, LLC
as 9:2023cv80734
Plaintiff:
RICHARD BLAIS
Defendant:
HOLIDAY CVS, LLC doing business as CVS PHARMACY #00426
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
BLAIS v. 3M COMPANY
as 1:2023cv00103
Plaintiff:
PAUL BLAIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BLAIS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv09143
Plaintiff:
PAUL BLAIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Perez v. Bowen et al
as 5:2023cv00322
Plaintiff:
Salvador Perez, Jr
Defendant:
Mark Bowen, FNU Caldwell, FNU Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blanchard v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv50129
Plaintiff:
Antonio Lee Blanchard
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Ganger, Blais and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In Re: Blais
as 23-8005
Respondent:
LEON ALAN BLAIS
Interested Party:
MA BOARD OF BAR OVERSEERS and MASSACHUSETTS SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
