Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Bowders et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2017cv03498
Plaintiff:
Alan D Bowders and Cynthia E Bowders
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Products Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moore et al v. Bowders et al
as 8:2017cv03398
Plaintiff:
Lynn Neal Moore and Mary C. Moore
Defendant:
Robert Allen Bowders and Shirley Contracting Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FISCHER et al v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
as 3:2017cv05183
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. , JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-10 and ABC COMPANIES 1-10
Plaintiff:
K. SCOTT FISCHER , PRIVATE CAPITAL LLC , CSD CAPITAL LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States of America v. Hott et al
as 1:2015cv02900
Defendant:
Ernest C. Hott, Jr., Brenda J. Bowders and Jo Ann Burger
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
FAGAN et al v. FISCHER et al
as 3:2014cv07013
Plaintiff:
TINA FAGAN and MICHAEL FAGAN
Defendant:
K. SCOTT FISCHER , VERONIKA M. FISCHER , BRIAN E. CARROLL and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
DUNSON v. KAGON
as 5:2012cv00134
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE L DUNSON
Defendant:
GALIRAK KAGON, ROBIN BRANCH, GREG PAYTHREES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUNSON v. KAGON, et al
as 5:2011cv00323
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE L DUNSON
Defendant:
GALINAK KAGON, LYSETTE LAGNES, ROBIN BRANCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowder v. State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2010mc00018
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Bowder
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, CCA/Contractor, SCCF and others
Kelvin Goode v. J. Tucker, et al
as 10-5561
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KELVIN D. GOODE
Defendant - Appellee:
J. TUCKER, W. WOOD, D. L. STINE, Warden and others
Goode v. Tucker et al
as 6:2009cv00387
Plaintiff:
Kelvin D. Goode
Defendant:
J. Tucker, W. Wood, D.L. Stine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
