Cases 11 - 20 of 1,671
Sierra Northern Railway et al v. City of Fort Bragg
as 1:2024cv04810
Plaintiff:
Sierra Northern Railway and Mendocino Railway
Defendant:
City of Fort Bragg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gu v. The City of New York
as 24-2064
Defendant:
MARIE BOLONA, Former Assistant Supervisor of Witness Aid Services Unit, District Attorney ALVIN BRAGG, JAVON HENRY, Former Assistant District Attorney and others
Plaintiff:
FEIFEI GU
Campbell et al v. The City of Morgantown
as 1:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Gary Freshour, Ashley Jenkins, George Calvert and others
Defendant:
The City of Morgantown
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Golden v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al
as 7:2024cv05759
Defendant:
SHAUN TANNER, CITY OF NEW YORK, ALVIN L. BRAGG, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
Warren Golden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gann et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2024cv00765
Plaintiff:
Dennisha Green, Angel Aguilar, Dori Buster Hanson and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Campbell et al v. The City of Morgantown
as 1:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Campbell, Klint Connery, Gary Freshour and others
Defendant:
The City of Morgantown
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
United States v. Bragg
as 24-6125
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JOHNNIE RAY BRAGG, JR.
Adim v. Bragg
as 1:2024cv04585
Plaintiff:
Cherubim Chinedum Adim doing business as Agourmp Global Solution Inc.
Defendant:
Alvin Leonard Bragg and Elected Manhattan DA, Alvin L. Bragg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Evans v. Supreme Court of NY
as 24-50465
Plaintiff:
Treniss J. Evans
Defendant:
Supreme Court of New York, Trial Division, Criminal Term, for the City of Manhattan, New York, Attn: Honorable Ellen N. Biben, Administrative Judge and Alvin Bragg, District Attorney for Manhattan, New York
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
