Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 91
US v. Umeh
as 23-1938
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant: KELECHI COLLINS UMEH, a/k/a Bishop, a/k/a Jacob Emmanuel, a/k/a James Emmanuel, a/k/a Kelvin Thomas, a/k/a Paul Douglas, a/k/a Brian Morgan, a/k/a John Isiah
Interested Party: CITIZENS BANK, N.A., SANTANDER BANK N.A. and TD BANK NA
MORGAN v. JOE BIDEN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv02740
Plaintiff: DAVID BRIAN MORGAN
Defendant: JOE BIDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MORGAN v. BIDEN
as 1:2023cv02223
Plaintiff: DAVID BRIAN MORGAN
Defendant: JOE BIDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Morgan We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-2079
Petitioner / Appellant: DAVID BRIAN MORGAN
Respondent / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
David Morgan v. USA
as 23-5112
Plaintiff / Appellant: David Brian Morgan
Defendant / Appellee: United States of America
In re: Morgan
as 23-2071
Petitioner: DAVID BRIAN MORGAN
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
MORGAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00543
Plaintiff: DAVID BRIAN MORGAN
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MORGAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2022cv00155
Plaintiff: DAVID BRIAN MORGAN
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. United States We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00891
Petitioner: David Brian Morgan
Respondent: United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MORGAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv23630
Plaintiff: BRIAN MORGAN
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?