Cases 11 - 20 of 155
Xavier Carino v. Attorney General United States of America
as 23-1522
Petitioner:
XAVIER CARINO
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
(PC) Carino v. Heath et al
as 2:2022cv01727
Plaintiff:
David Yancy Carino
Defendant:
Justin Heath, Crystal Houston, Joseph Villanueva and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Carino v. Heath et al
as 1:2022cv01235
Plaintiff:
David Yancy Carino
Defendant:
Justin Heath, Crystal Houston, Joseph Villanueva and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rosalinda CarinoIn re: Rosalinda Carino
as 22-2521
Petitioner:
In re: ROSALINDA O. CARINO
Respondent:
ESSEX COUNTY SHERIFF ARMANDO B. FONTOURA
Rosalinda Carino v. Armando Fontoura
as 22-2159
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROSALINDA O. CARINO
Defendant / Appellee:
CHIEF SHERIFF ARMANDO B. FONTOURA
Carino Mendoza et al v. Quattro Gatti Restaurant Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03136
Plaintiff:
Moises Luis Carino Mendoza
Defendant:
Quattro Gatti Restaurant Inc. doing business as Quattro Gatti and Remo Mastrangelo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
David Lola v. Monroe County Sheriff, et al
as 22-10810
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID JAMES LOLA
Defendant / Appellee:
MONROE COUNTY SHERIFF, Rick Ramsey, individually and as Monroe County Sheriff, ARAMARK, INC., a corporation of unknown origin, ANNE SWEENEY, individually and as Sheriff's Officer and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00244
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv23394
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
