Cases filed in North Carolina
Cases 11 - 20 of 50
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00642
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2018cv00137
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reaves v. Benjamin et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2018cv00221
Plaintiff: Margaret Reaves
Defendant: John T. Benjamin, Jr. , Jake R. Garris , Cecil Capps and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lewis v. Spellings et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2017cv00074
Plaintiff: Travis Earl Lewis
Defendant: Margaret M.L. Spellings, W Louis Bissette, Jr, Cecil P Staton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lewis v. Spellings et al
as 5:2017cv00261
Plaintiff: Travis Earl Lewis
Defendant: Margaret M.L. Spellings, W Louis Bissette, Jr, Cecil P Staton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davis v. United States of America et al
as 5:2017ct03116
Plaintiff: Cecil McDonald Davis
Defendant: United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, M.D. Carvajal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MORGAN v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2017cv00380
Plaintiff: CECIL HAROLD MORGAN, III
Defendant: NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Interested_party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Muhammed v. Tripp et al
as 5:2016hc02123
Petitioner: Cecil Muhammad
Respondent: Brick Tripp and US Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CRESS
as 1:2015mc00045
Petitioner: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent: CECIL R. CRESS
Gilbert v. USA
as 4:2015cv00104
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Cecil Vann Gilbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?