Cases
Cases 11 - 17 of 17
BANKS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv01615
Plaintiff: FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, BEN LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. United States of America et al
as 1:2013cv02697
Plaintiff: Frederick Banks
Defendant: United States of America, An unknown named Assistant United States Attorney, United States Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Platshorn v. United States of America, et al
as 9:2012cv80643
Plaintiff: Robert E. Platshorn
Defendant: United States Parole Commission, Chairman of the United States Parole Commission, Probation Officer of the United States and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Betty Loren-Maltese v. Kristine Phillip
as 11-1634
Petitioner - Appellant: BETTY LOREN-MALTESE
Respondent - Appellee: KRISTINE PHILLIPS, Chief United States Probation Officer, Northern District of Illinois
Perry v. Chief United States Probation Officer
as 1:2011cv20256
Petitioner: Angelo B. Perry
Respondent: Chief United States Probation Officer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Joyce Garland-Sash v. USA, et al
as 09-1733
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOYCE R. GARLAND-SASH
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CLOSTER POL DEPT, JEROME IKALOWYCH, Detective Sergeant Closter (New Jersey) Police Department and others
Defendant: MEGHAN SACKS and JANICE FINK, Senior United States Probation Office - DNJ
THOMPSON v. LAPPIN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2007cv02694
Petitioner: RICHARD THOMPSON
Respondent: HARLEY LAPPIN, CHIEF UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICER EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA and CHIEF UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICER CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?