Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 917
Brown v. Osborn CI
as 3:2024cv00599
Plaintiff: William H. Brown
Defendant: Osborn CI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ho v. The United States of America
as 4:2024cv01538
Plaintiff: Jian-Ci Ho
Defendant: The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
Adam Hall v. DAC Prison
as 24-6261
Plaintiff: ADAM WADE HALL, a/k/a Abdul Al Kareem Muhammad
Defendant: DAC PRISON and RAYMOND BAILEY, Tabor CI Program Director
Milton v. Osbron CI
as 3:2024cv00636
Plaintiff: Marcus Milton
Defendant: Osborn CI and Osbron CI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Derrick James v. The Geo Group, Inc., et al
as 24-11458
Plaintiff: DERRICK GREGORY JAMES
Defendant: THE GEO GROUP, INC., ASSISTANT WARDEN, UXAVIER BROOMSFIELD and others
George Steen v. Todd Ishee
as 24-6409
Petitioner: GEORGE MICHAEL STEEN
Respondent: TODD E. ISHEE, Secretary of the Department of Adult Correction and BRETT BULLIS, Warden of Avery-Mitchell CI
Emrit et al v. The Republic of Cuba et al
as 1:2024cv00482
Plaintiff: Ronald Satish Emrit and Presidential Committee/Political Action Committee/Separate Segreated Fund (SSF) Number C00569897 d/b/a United Emrits of America
Defendant: The Republic of Cuba, Embassy of Cuba, Cuban Intelligence Service (CIS) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Ho v. Internal Revenue Service/ Department of Treasury
as 3:2024cv02404
Plaintiff: Jian-Ci Ho
Defendant: Internal Revenue Service/ Department of Treasury
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ho
as 3:2024cv02406
Plaintiff: Jian-Ci Ho
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ho v. Internal Revenue Service/ Department of Treasury
as 5:2024cv02408
Plaintiff: Jian-Ci Ho
Defendant: Internal Revenue Service/ Department of Treasury
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?