Cases 11 - 20 of 916
Ho v. Internal Revenue Service/ Department of Treasury
as 5:2024cv02408
Plaintiff:
Jian-Ci Ho
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service/ Department of Treasury
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ho v. Internal Revenue Service/ Department of Treasury
as 4:2024cv02410
Plaintiff:
Jian-Ci Ho
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service/ Department of Treasury
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Emrit et al v. The Republic of Cuba et al
as 1:2024cv00482
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit and Presidential Committee/Political Action Committee/Separate Segreated Fund (SSF) Number C00569897 d/b/a United Emrits of America
Defendant:
The Republic of Cuba, Embassy of Cuba, Cuban Intelligence Service (CIS) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Emrit et al v. The Republic of Cuba et al
as 3:2024cv00629
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit and Presidential Committee/Political Action Committee/Separate Segreated Fund (SSF) Number C00569897 d/b/a United Emrits of America
Defendant:
The Republic of Cuba, Embassy of Cuba, Cuban Intelligence Service (CIS) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
EMRIT v. THE REPUBLIC OF CUBA et al
as 2:2024cv04707
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant:
THE REPUBLIC OF CUBA, THE EMBASSY OF CUBA, CUBAN INTELLIGENCE SERVICE (CIS) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HILL v. WARDEN JEFFERSON CI
as 4:2024cv00164
Petitioner:
REGINALD HILL
Respondent:
WARDEN JEFFERSON CI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Milton v. Osbron CI
as 3:2024cv00636
Plaintiff:
Marcus Milton
Defendant:
Osborn CI and Osbron CI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Osborn CI
as 3:2024cv00599
Plaintiff:
William H. Brown
Defendant:
Osborn CI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
