Cases 11 - 20 of 1,210
Vicentic v. City of Hot Springs
as 6:2024cv06042
Plaintiff:
Dragan Vicentic
Defendant:
City of Hot Springs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Ortiz v. Little Rock, City of et al
as 4:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Cindy Ortiz
Defendant:
Little Rock, City of, Henry Topps, Joshua Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv05060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Luke 21 4-B Ministry & Home Rentals LLC v. Osceola, City of et al
as 3:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Luke 21 4-B Ministry & Home Rentals LLC
Defendant:
Osceola, City of and Joe Harris, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
City of Gassville, Arkansas v. Midwest Hydro Drilling & Service, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv03015
Plaintiff:
City of Gassville, Arkansas
Defendant:
Midwest Hydro Drilling & Service, Inc. and Granite Re, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Brewer v. Talley et al
as 2:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Travon S Brewer
Defendant:
Michael T Talley and Jonesboro Arkansas, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Finley v. Citi Tele Com
as 6:2024cv06022
Plaintiff:
Jamie Glenn Finley and Possum
Defendant:
Citi Tele Com
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neice v. City of Van Buren, Arkansas
as 2:2024cv02027
Plaintiff:
Richard William Neice
Defendant:
City of Van Buren, Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
