Cases 11 - 20 of 549
William Pickard, III v. American Pride Properties LLC, et al
as 23-13834
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM M. PICKARD, III
Defendant / Appellee:
AMERICAN PRIDE PROPERTIES LLC, SPM PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC, TIFFANY CONE and others
Pickard v. American Pride Properties LLC et al
as 2:2023cv01545
Defendant:
SPM Property Management LLC, American Pride Properties LLC, SPM Inc and others
Plaintiff:
William M Pickard, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Berryhill v. Cone-Omega, LLC et al
as 9:2023cv05570
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Berryhill
Defendant:
Cone-Omega, LLC, Cone Machinery, Inc. and Omega Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Cone et al v. State Farm Lloyds
as 4:2023cv04078
Plaintiff:
James Cone and Laran T. Cone
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Buie v. Cone et al
as 3:2023cv05095
Plaintiff:
RaeQuann Dominique Buie
Defendant:
Jamie Bernard Cone, Jr. and Danielle Denise Roberts
Not Classified By Court:
Progressive Northern Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
CONELY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv16633
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER CONELY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Baker et al v. Collier et al
as 1:2023cv00190
Plaintiff:
Matthew Baker, Robert Andrews, Timothy Cone and others
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Oscar Mendoza, Bobby Lumpkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ABERWALD et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv01465
Plaintiff:
MARK ABERWALD, JOSE MENDEZ, JR., VIRGINIA KNAUEL and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
