Cases 11 - 20 of 70
Amado Cancino v. Federal Correctional Center Lompoc
as 2:2023cv02590
Petitioner:
Amado Estevez Cancino
Respondent:
Federal Correctional Center Lompoc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ruiz v. Morales et al
as 2:2023cv00162
Plaintiff:
Martin Moreno Ruiz
Defendant:
Luz Maria Aguilar Morales, EduardoTomas Medina Mora Icaza, Lilia Monica Lopez Benitez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SALCEDO v. CANCINOS
as 2:2022cv05596
Plaintiff:
NADINE SALCEDO
Defendant:
EDGAR CANCINOS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
(SS) Cancino v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2022cv01055
Plaintiff:
Marshall Lloyd Cancino
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Cancino v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2022at00627
Plaintiff:
Marshall Lloyd Cancino
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Burns v. City Of Waukegan et al
as 1:2022cv02833
Plaintiff:
CORINTHIAN ("COREY") BURNS
Defendant:
City Of Waukegan, Wayne Walles, Sam Cunningham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cancino v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2022cv00853
Plaintiff:
Analia Cancino
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Cancino v. Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv00508
Plaintiff:
Analia Cancino
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Cancino v. Lumpkin
as 22-40112
Petitioner / Appellant:
Joseph D. Cancino
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Giraldo et al v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 1:2021cv24230
Plaintiff:
Luz Giraldo and Alvaro Cancino
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
