Cases 11 - 20 of 53
Lund, et al v. Certegy Check Services, Inc
as 3:2013cv03064
Plaintiff:
Marlen Lund and Karen Lund
Defendant:
Certegy Check Services, Inc and Collections Acquisition Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LUND et al v. CERTEGY CHECK SERVICES, INC.
as 1:2013cv00139
Plaintiff:
MARLEN LUND and KAREN LUND
Defendant:
CERTEGY CHECK SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Account Receivable
Longo et al v. Walgreen Co.
as 1:2013cv23392
Plaintiff:
Edward M Longo and Antoinette M Longo
Defendant:
Walgreen Co., TRS Recovery Services, Inc., Telecheck Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv13233
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Anita Simpson v. Certegy Check Services Inc.
as 12-14352
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANITA JOY SIMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CERTEGY CHECK SERVICES INC.
Smith v. Certegy Check Services, Inc.
as 1:2012cv02613
Defendant:
Certegy Check Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Andrea Smith
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00836
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Clingan v. Certegy Payment Recovery Services Incorporated et al
as 2:2011cv00087
Plaintiff:
Peggy Clingan
Defendant:
Certegy Payment Recovery Services Incorporated, Certegy Check Services, Incorporated, Coach Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Simpson v. Certegy Check Services, Inc. et al
as 5:2011cv00025
Plaintiff:
Anita Joy Simpson
Defendant:
Murphy Oil USA Inc. and Certegy Check Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
