Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Riess v. Castillo et al
as 2:2011cv01715
Plaintiff:
Richard Steven Riess
Defendant:
Gloria Castillo, C Armel, Joel Stilchen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riess v. DeRosa et al
as 2:2011cv01666
Plaintiff:
Richard Steven Riess
Defendant:
Charles DeRosa, Karl Stansel, Kash Elkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00947
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Raza v. Corrections Corporation of America, et al
as 2:2011cv00732
Plaintiff:
J Alberto Gonzalez Raza
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America , David Myers, Gay Vick, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Torrez v. Corrections Corporation, et al
as 10-17302
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID TORREZ
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, named as Corrections Corp. of America in original complaint, (CCA), a corporation incorporated under the laws of the State of Tennesee and licensed to do business in Arizona, MURIEL POWERS, Chaplain at La Palma Correctional Center, JUSTIN ROBERTS, Religous Facilitator at LPCC and others
Torrez v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 2:2010cv00116
Plaintiff:
David Torrez
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Muriel Powers, James Schomig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yang v. Derosa
as 2:2009cv02578
Plaintiff:
Teng Yang
Defendant:
Charles DeRosa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Yang v. Derosa
as 4:2009cv03374
Plaintiff:
Teng Yang
Defendant:
Charles Derosa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anthony Carrasco v. Charles DeRosa
as 2:2009cv03321
Petitioner:
Anthony Carrasco
Respondent:
Charles DeRosa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
