Cases 11 - 20 of 210
Riddle #811130 v. James et al
as 2:2023cv00057
Plaintiff:
Trequan Riddle #811130
Defendant:
Brenda James, Charles Scott, Unknown Kubant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Fisher
as 22-1764
Petitioner:
THOMAS CHARLES SCOTT
Respondent:
LANDON BIRD, WARDEN and RAYTHEL FISHER, WARDEN
Riddle #811130 v. Moyer et al
as 2:2023cv00058
Plaintiff:
Trequan Riddle #811130
Defendant:
S. Moyer, Sabrina Aiken, Brenda James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Colbert
as 3:2023cv00111
Plaintiff:
Charles Scott
Defendant:
Warden Unknown Colbert
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Scott v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv17502
Plaintiff:
Charles Scott
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Scott v. GlaxoSmithKline et al
as 3:2023cv13952
Plaintiff:
Charles Scott
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline, Patheon Inc., Pfizer Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HERRING v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv03914
Plaintiff:
CHARLES SCOTT HERRING, IV
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MILLER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv24907
Plaintiff:
CHARLES SCOTT MILLER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Beverley West v. Charles Jackson, et al
as 22-2536
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Beverley West
Defendant / Appellee:
Charles Scott Jackson and Circuit Court of Carroll County, Arkansas
USA v. Robert Scott
as 22-35716
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERT CHARLES SCOTT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
