Cases 11 - 20 of 83
Clervrain et al v. Brown et al
as 1:2022cv00004
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Alex Felix, Woodny Lormil and others
Defendant:
Ann Brown, Craig Campbell, Mike Tauriainen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Hoss et al
as 4:2022cv00007
Plaintiff:
Stanley E. Smith
Defendant:
Terrence Hoss, State of Alaska, Christopher Knowles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Blakeley v. Gunderson et al
as 3:2022cv00035
Plaintiff:
Barry Blakeley
Defendant:
Daniel G. Gunderson, Christopher Rafferty, Timothy Wolff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ludvick v. Reigh et al
as 3:2022cv00036
Petitioner:
Lee J Ludvick
Respondent:
Christina L. Reigh, Christopher S. Lesch, William Vitkus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Worthen v. GEICO Choice Insurance Company
as 3:2021cv00257
Plaintiff:
Christopher Worthen
Defendant:
GEICO Choice Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Rubaroc USA et al
as 3:2021cv00213
Plaintiff:
Christopher J Jones
Defendant:
Rubaroc USA, Rubaroc Inc, Vulcan Surfacing Systems Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Tugatuk v. Reigh et al
as 3:2021cv00174
Plaintiff:
Geoffrey Tugatuk
Defendant:
Christina L. Reigh, Ben Turner, Jerilyn T. Moore and others
Eady v. Franciosi et al
as 3:2021cv00175
Plaintiff:
Tierre Fady and Tierre Eady
Defendant:
Michael Franciosi, Thomas Mathews, Jeffrey Bell and others
Cooks v. Transportation Security Administration et al
as 4:2021cv00013
Defendant:
Transportation Security Administration, Drug Emforcement Administration, United States Marshals Service and others
Plaintiff:
Willie Cooks
Miller v. Knapp et al
as 3:2021cv00150
Defendant:
Nancy Dalhstrom, John Fonstad, Thomas Elmore and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
