Cases 11 - 20 of 541
Precision Optical Technologies, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
as 6:2024cv06134
Plaintiff:
Precision Optical Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
Cisco Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Lionra Technologies Ltd. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Lionra Technologies Ltd.
Defendant:
Cisco Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
NextGen Innovations, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
NextGen Innovations, LLC
Defendant:
Cisco Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Duraisamy v. Sairam Babu, et al.
as 24-457
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NAGARAJAN DURAISAMY
Defendant / Appellee:
PRADEEP PULI RUKMANGATHA SAIRAM BABU, KOUSALYA NAGARAJAN, HCL TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED and others
Croga Innovations Ltd. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Croga Innovations Ltd.
Defendant:
Cisco Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Cisco Systems, Inc., et al. v. Dexon Computer, Inc.
as 24-265
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. and CISCO TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Defendant / Appellant:
DEXON COMPUTER, INC.
Stanford v. Microsoft Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00245
Plaintiff:
Joseph A. Stanford
Defendant:
Microsoft Inc., Cisco Systems Inc., Internal Revenue Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ACQIS LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
as 6:2023cv00884
Plaintiff:
ACQIS LLC
Defendant:
Cisco Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
STANFORD v. MICROSOFT INC. et al
as 1:2023cv02179
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH STANFORD and SOFTWHO
Defendant:
MICROSOFT INC., CISCO SYSTEMS INC., PFIZER INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sensor360 LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
as 6:2023cv00806
Plaintiff:
Sensor360 LLC
Defendant:
Cisco Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
