Cases 11 - 20 of 546
Conyers v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2023cv00740
Plaintiff:
Laura P. Conyers
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Conyer v. Guyton et al
as 1:2023cv01772
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Conyer
Defendant:
Whitteney Guyton, SYNERGY HEALTH SYSTEMS LLC, DARMESHIA Guyton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Conyer v. Guyton et al
as 2:2023cv00689
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Conyers
Defendant:
Whitteney L. Guyton, Darmeshia R. Guyton, Synergy Health Systems, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05815
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
PARTLOW v. BROWN et al
as 1:2023cv02208
Plaintiff:
EDWARD M. PARTLOW
Defendant:
BROWN, EARNEST, JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARTLOW v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv02207
Plaintiff:
EDWARD M. PARTLOW
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, CHARLENE BURKETT, A. BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MINOR v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv02188
Plaintiff:
JAMAR KENNETH MINOR
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, C. CONYERS, J. EARNEST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VILCHUCK v. CENTURION OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2023cv02184
Plaintiff:
SETH ADAM VILCHUCK
Defendant:
CENTURION OF INDIANA, LISA HAMBLEN, CHARLES HOUCHINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOORE v. REGALE et al
as 1:2023cv02170
Plaintiff:
DERRIOUS MOORE
Defendant:
DENNIS REGALE, FOX, CONYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VERMILLION et al v. CENTURION HEALTH, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv02165
Plaintiff:
JAY F. VERMILLION
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH, INC., JOHN L. MERSHON, VERNON L. OSBURN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
