Cases 11 - 20 of 100
Barnett v. Federal Express Corporation
as 2:2026cv02968
Plaintiff:
Kyle Barnett
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hubbard-Sarvis v. Barnette
as 7:2026cv03961
Plaintiff:
Deborah V.G. Hubbard-Sarvis
Defendant:
Barry Barnette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Lettman, Tyrone v. Deputy Lindsey (John Doe) et al
as 3:2026cv00938
Plaintiff:
Tyrone John Lettman
Defendant:
Deputy Lindsey (John Doe), Deputy Horton, Deputy Eith (John Doe) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jabarah et al (PS) v. Baysore et al
as 1:2026cv04224
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Mansour Jabarah and Muhanad Mahmoud Al-Farekh
Defendant:
D. Baysore, A. Matevousian and T. Barnett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnett v. Federal Express Corporation
as 7:2026cv07721
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Barnett
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00557
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv03891
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00551
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
BARNETT v. WILKERSON et al
as 2:2026cv00597
Plaintiff:
CAMERON BARNETT
Defendant:
WILKERSON, PABLO PEREZ and CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.