Cases 11 - 20 of 177
Zhe Zhang v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 16-60681
Petitioner:
Zhe Zhang
Respondent:
Loretta Lynch, U. S. Attorney General, Sally Q. Yates, Acting U.S. Attorney General, Dana J. Boente, Acting U.S. Attorney General and others
City of Chelsea et al v. Trump, President of the United States et al
as 1:2017cv10214
Plaintiff:
City of Chelsea and City of Lawrence
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, United States of America, John F. Kelly, Secretary of the United States Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447
NEMA v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 4:2017cv01525
Plaintiff:
YASSER J. NEMA
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security , United States Citizenship and Immigration Services , John F Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
BANCROFT GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT et al v. KOSKINEN et al
as 1:2017cv00395
Plaintiff:
BANCROFT GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT , MICHAEL STOCK and MELISSA BATES STOCK
Defendant:
JOHN KOSKINEN, DOE 1-100 JOHN, JEFFERSON SESSIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7428
Xiaoyu Ling v. Jefferson Session
as 17-70362
Petitioner:
XIAOYU LING
Respondent:
DANA J. BOENTE, Acting Attorney General
Persaud v. Session
as 17-379
Petitioner:
Bhisham Persaud, AKA Bhisahm Persaud
Respondent:
Dana J. Boente, United States Acting Attorney General
Peng Lin v. Jefferson Session
as 17-70361
Petitioner:
PENG LIN
Respondent:
DANA J. BOENTE, Acting Attorney General
Jun Li v. Jefferson Session
as 17-70367
Petitioner:
JUN FU LI
Respondent:
DANA J. BOENTE, Acting Attorney General
Joaquin Uresty-Garcia v. Jefferson Session
as 17-70364
Petitioner:
JOAQUIN URESTY-GARCIA, AKA Cesar Alan, AKA Anastacio Altamirano, AKA Alan Ceazer-Hutron, AKA Cesar Hutron
Respondent:
DANA J. BOENTE, Acting Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
