Cases 11 - 20 of 20
TYLER v. BARCELLONA et al
as 1:2018cv00183
Plaintiff:
MILO DANIEL TYLER
Defendant:
TOM BARCELLONA, ANDREW P. CLEMENT, WILLIAMS W. BAGGS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TYLER v. CLEMENT
as 1:2017cv00374
Plaintiff:
MILO DANIEL TYLER
Defendant:
ANDREW P. CLEMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROOKS et al v. BANK MARKAZI JOMHOURI ISLAMI IRAN et al
as 1:2017cv00737
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA BROOKS , JOYCE BROOKS , DANNY BROOKS and others
Defendant:
BANK MARKAZI JOMHOURI ISLAMI IRAN, BANK MELLI IRAN, MELLI BANK PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
Cameron v. X-Ray Professional Association et al
as 1:2016cv00343
Plaintiff:
John Cameron
Defendant:
Douglas K. Ewing, Mark A. Hadley, Timothy J. McCormack and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Laurence v. Wall, et al
as 11-1749
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NORMAN LAURENCE
Defendant - Appellee:
A.T. WALL, GEORGE A. VOSE, JAKE GADSDEN and others
Laurence v. Wall, et al
as 11-1749
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NORMAN LAURENCE
Defendant / Appellee:
ASHBEL T. WALL, GEORGE A. VOSE, JAKE GADSDEN and others
Muckle v. UNCF et al
as 1:2009cv02387
Plaintiff:
Arelious Muckle
Defendant:
UNCF, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Michael Lomax and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Type:
Other Statutes
Muckle v. UNCF et al
as 1:2009mi00335
Plaintiff:
Arelious Muckle
Defendant:
UNCF, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Michael Lomax and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Type:
Other Statutes
Laurence v. Wall, et al
as 08-1380
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NORMAN LAURENCE
Defendant - Appellee:
A.T. WALL, GEORGE A. VOSE, JAKE GADSDEN and others
Norman Laurence v. A.T. Wall, et al
as 1:2007cv00081
Plaintiff:
Norman Laurence
Defendant:
A.T. Wall, George A. Vose, Jake Gadsden and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
