Cases 11 - 20 of 101
USA v. Daniel Inman
as 22-5141
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DANIEL LEWIS INMAN
Lewis-McLaurin v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2022cv00542
Plaintiff:
Danielle Lewis-McLaurin
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lewis v. Lockwood Andrews & Newnam, P.C. et al
as 5:2021cv12858
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lewis
Defendant:
Lockwood Andrews & Newnam, P.C., Lockwood Andrews & Newnam, Inc., Leo A. Daly Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FINDER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv62559
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LEWIS FINDER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEWIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv21978
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JASON DANIEL LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2021cv01095
Defendant:
Daniel Lewis
Plaintiff:
Hilliard Martinez Gonzalez, LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hilliard Martinez Gonzales LLP v. Lewis
as 2:2021cv00063
Defendant:
Daniel Lewis
Plaintiff:
Hilliard Martinez Gonzales LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00431
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Beckwitt v. Smith et al
as 1:2021cv00578
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lewis Beckwitt
Defendant:
Michele Smith, A non-zero quantity of John Doe Judge(s) for the Circuit Court of Montgomery County, MD and An unknown quantity of John Doe defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Beckwitt v. Montgomery County et al
as 8:2020cv02639
Defendant:
Maryland Montgomery County, Anne Arundel County Maryland, Amanda Kraemer and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lewis Beckwitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
