Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Webb et al v. Pat Salmon & Sons, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv02352
Plaintiff:
Shawnda Crystal Webb and James Maddoe
Defendant:
Pat Salmon & Sons, Inc. and Danny Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilson v. Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2013cv00551
Petitioner:
Danny Wilson
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma and Justin Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2012mc00099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2012cv02307
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Wilson v. J. McDonald, et.al.
as 5:2012cv02803
Plaintiff:
Dannie Wilson
Defendant:
J. McDonald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv02308
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01185
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
WILSON v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE HOLDINGS (AMERICAS) INC.
as 2:2010cv06420
Plaintiff:
DANNY WILSON
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE HOLDINGS (AMERICAS) INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Robert Eckerman v. Tennessee Department of Safety, et al
as 09-6181
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT ECKERMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY, an agency of the State of Tennessee, GERALD NICELY, Former Department of Safety Commissioner, in his individual and official capacities, MIKE WALKER, Colonel, Tennessee Highway Patrol, in his individual and official capacities and others
Eckerman v. Tennessee Department of Safety et al
as 3:2007cv00627
Plaintiff:
Robert Eckerman
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Safety, Gerald Nicely, Mike Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
