Cases 11 - 20 of 78
United States of America v. Evans (Williams)
as 20-4156
Defendant:
Ernest Hester, AKA Sealed Defendant #9, AKA EB, Miquan Russo, AKA Sealed Defendant #6, AKA Shyce, Amadis Hunter, AKA Sealed Defendant #8, AKA Baldy and others
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jarrell Williams, AKA Sealed Defendant #2, AKA Rugga, AKA Rel, AKA Ruggarel
WILLIAMS v. MARQUEZ et al
as 1:2020cv17464
Defendant:
SERGIO MARQUEZ, VAN DU LEE, OFFICER M. LOATMAN and others
Plaintiff:
DARNELL WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv06918
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DARNELL WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Kenneth Williams
as 20-10686
Defendant / Appellant:
KENNETH DARNELL WILLIAMS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
WILLIAMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv04941
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DARNELL WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. United States of America
as 4:2019cv00411
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Kevin Darnell Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Williams v. USA
as 3:2019cv01432
Petitioner:
Kendrick Darnell Williams
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
ZIMMERMAN et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03269
Plaintiff:
DENVER WILLIAMS, THOMAS MAY, TROY MULLINS and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Zimmerman et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02241
Plaintiff:
Denver Williams, Thomas May, Troy Mullins and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Balfour Beatty Communities, LLC v. Williams
as 1:2019cv02821
Defendant:
Darnelle Williams
Plaintiff:
Balfour Beatty Communities, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
