Cases 11 - 20 of 474
Henderson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
David Earl Henderson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Gallegos v. Maxson et al
as 2:2023cv01257
Plaintiff:
David Earl Ray Gallegos
Defendant:
Peter L Maxson, Jr, Michael M Silva and Brittany A Richards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Boyd
as 23-10695
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
David Earl Boyd
US v. David Valentine
as 23-4386
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID EARL VALENTINE
Bothwell et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv01240
Defendant:
Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc, 3M Company and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmie L Bothwell, Thomas John Bigford, Joseph Frank Bilski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
WATTLETON v. PETERS
as 1:2023cv00821
Plaintiff:
DAVID EARL WATTLETON
Defendant:
COLETTE PETERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strange v. TDCJ-CID
as 5:2023cv00076
Plaintiff:
David Earl Strange
Defendant:
TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spillman Jr v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2023cv00668
Petitioner:
David Earl Spillman, Jr
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stanny Ray Hudgins et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv01747
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Stanny Ray Hudgins, Philip Wendell Gould, Frank Joseph Micalizzi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
US v. David Page
as 23-4293
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID EARL PAGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
