Cases 11 - 20 of 116
Wallace Mitchell v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 21-3355
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WALLACE MITCHELL
Defendant:
HARLEY LAPPIN, Director-Bureau of Prisons, THOMAS R. KANE, Director Federal Bureau of Prisons, HARRELL WATTS, Administrator/Bureau of Prisons and others
Hudson v. The Lee Thompson Company
as 4:2021cv03366
Plaintiff:
Michael David Hudson
Defendant:
The Lee Thompson Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
HUDSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv44358
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DAVID HUDSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Montgomery v. State of Texas
as 21-50585
Defendant / Appellee:
Police Department, State of Texas and David Hudson
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John Montgomery
McKenzie v. Erksine et al
as 3:2021cv50048
Defendant:
T.K. Ramierez, R. Erksine, Dr. Levy and others
Plaintiff:
Davon McKenzie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Lappin et al
as 1:2021cv00163
Defendant:
Kevin Bittenbender, Mark Preoria, David C. Young and others
Plaintiff:
Wallace Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HUDSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv05272
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID HUDSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HUDSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv87990
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID HUDSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McLean v. Safeway, Inc. et al
as 8:2020cv01999
Defendant:
Safeway, Inc., Dimas Daniel Benitez Garcia, David Hudson and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ramon McLean
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
HUDSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv75317
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID HUDSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
