Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Phillips v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2015cv02840
Plaintiff:
Thomas Dean Phillips, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan et al v. Dean Phillip Murphy
as 5:2014cv00855
Plaintiff:
Administrative Maintenance Fund, Trustees of the Inland Empire IBEW-NECA Labor-Management Cooperation Committee, Trustees of the National Electrical Benefit Fund and others
Defendant:
Dean Phillip Murphy
Dean Carter v. Kevin Chappell
as 13-99007
Petitioner - Appellant:
DEAN PHILLIP CARTER
Respondent - Appellee:
KEVIN CHAPPELL, Warden, San Quentin State Prison
United States of America v. Phillips
as 5:2013cv00512
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Garry Dean Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
Dean Carter v. Kevin Chappell
as 13-99003
Petitioner - Appellant:
DEAN PHILLIP CARTER
Respondent - Appellee:
KEVIN CHAPPELL, Warden, San Quentin State Prison
Dean Harris v. Vargo, et al
as 10-35490
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEAN PHILLIP HARRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
VARGO, Dr., HARDY MYERS, STEVE SHELTON, M.D. and others
Henry v. Phillips et al
as 6:2010cv00172
Plaintiff:
Earl W. Henry, Jr.
Defendant:
Ralph Dean Phillips, Phillips Transportation and Great West Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Phillips et al v. Trans Union LLC et al
as 0:2010cv00673
Plaintiff:
Robert Dean Phillips and Mary Jo Phillips
Defendant:
Trans Union LLC and Experian Information Solutions Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Phillips, Jr. v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 10-6032
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM DEAN PHILLIPS, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA and GREG WILLIAMS
James Phillips v. Jean Hill
as 09-36034
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES DEAN PHILLIPS
Respondent - Appellee:
JEAN HILL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
