Cases 11 - 20 of 24
DENNIS COX LLC et al v. PEARSON EDUCATION, INC.
as 2:2014cv02185
Plaintiff:
DENNIS COX LLC , VICTOR ENGLEBERT , ROBERT FRIED and others
Defendant:
PEARSON EDUCATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Dennis Cox v. E. Barfield, et al
as 14-10244
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS COX
Defendant - Appellee:
E. A. BARFIELD, Classification Officer over Pride Functions, PRIDE ENTERPRISE CORPORATION, BARFIELD, MS Supervisor at Calhoun CI for Pride and others
COX v. PRIDE ENTERPRISES
as 4:2013cv00399
Plaintiff:
DENNIS COX
Defendant:
E A BARFIELD and PRIDE ENTERPRISE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McElroy v. Mabry et al
as 6:2010cv00300
Defendant:
Dennis Cox, Mr. J. B. Freeman, Char Mabry and others
Plaintiff:
Charles R. McElroy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cox v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
as 3:2010cv01956
Plaintiff:
Dennis Cox
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cox v. Weissman et al
as 0:2010cv61597
Plaintiff:
Dennis Cox
Defendant:
Bra1 Weissman, Christopher McCall and John Ross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox v. Ballante et al
as 0:2010cv61536
Plaintiff:
Dennis Cox
Defendant:
Frank Ballante, Matthew Mark and Lacy Crew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Poulin, et al
as 09-1701
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY DEWAYNE JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT THYNG, Unit Manager, NNHCF, in his individual and official capacities
Defendant:
JOSEPH BACHOFER, Maintenance Supervisor, NNHCF, in his individual and official capacities, LARRY BLAISDELL, Warden, Northern NH Correctional Facility, in his individual and official capacities, DENNIS COX, Major, NNHCF, in his individual and official capacities and others
:
and
Kloeckl v. Moreno Valley High School et al
as 6:2009cv00240
Plaintiff:
Bradley Kloeckl and Bradley Kloeckl
Defendant:
Moreno Valley High School, Kurt Kaufman, Richard Bingham and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
