Cases 11 - 20 of 104
Crane v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv00004
Petitioner:
Donald Richard Crane
Respondent:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Mark C Meyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Swan v. Unwin et al
as 3:2022cv01002
Plaintiff:
William Swan
Defendant:
Donald Richard Unwin, Angie Crain, Frank Lawrence and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Donald Crane
as 22-1849
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Donald Richard Crane
CLAYTOR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv48516
Plaintiff:
DONALD RICHARD CLAYTOR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Richard et al v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co
as 2:2021cv01916
Special Master:
Cade Richard Cole and Patrick A Juneau, Jr
Plaintiff:
Donald Richard and Michelle Richard
Defendant:
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GRANT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv11499
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DONALD RICHARD GRANT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Donald Terry v. Phillip Roberson, et al
as 21-10328
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD RICHARD TERRY
Defendant / Appellee:
T YOUNG and PHILLIP ROBERSON
UNGERECHT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv66469
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DONALD RICHARD UNGERECHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Terry v. Roberson et al
as 5:2020cv00513
Plaintiff:
Donald Richard Terry
Defendant:
Phillip Roberson and T. Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RICHARDS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv35932
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DONALD RICHARDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
