Cases 11 - 20 of 26
In Re: James C. Platt
as 14-3285
Defendant - Petitioner:
In re: JAMES C. PLATTS
Plaintiff - Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
DONETTA W. AMBROSE
In Re: James C. Platt
as 14-3225
Defendant - Petitioner:
In re: JAMES C. PLATTS
Plaintiff - Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
DONETTA W. AMBROSE
Brown v. Lancaster et al
as 3:2014cv01180
Plaintiff:
Alton D. Brown
Defendant:
Gary L. Lancaster, J. Curtis Joyner, Thomas J. Rueter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In Re: James C. Platt
as 14-1180
Defendant - Petitioner:
In re: JAMES C. PLATTS
Plaintiff - Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
DONETTA W. AMBROSE
In re: James Platt
as 14-1017
Defendant - Petitioner:
In re: JAMES C. PLATTS
Plaintiff - Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
DONETTA W. AMBROSE
In Re: James C. Platt
as 13-4508
Defendant - Petitioner:
In re: JAMES C. PLATTS
Plaintiff - Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
DONETTA W. AMBROSE
James Platts v. Mary Buchanan
as 13-7574
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES C. PLATTS
Defendant - Appellee:
MARY BETH BUCHANAN, JOHN JEFFREY MILLER, HAROLD STANTON and others
In re: Jay Yunik
as 13-3741
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: JAY V. YUNIK
Defendant - Respondent:
CATHERINE C. MCVEY, MATTHEW T. MANGINO, Member- Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
DONETTA W. AMBROSE
PLATTS v. BUCHANAN et al
as 2:2013cv00803
Plaintiff:
JAMES C. PLATTS
Defendant:
MARY BETH BUCHANAN, JOHN JEFFREY MILLER, HAROLD STANTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Platts v. Buchanan et al
as 2:2013cv00042
Plaintiff:
James C. Platts
Defendant:
Mary Beth Buchanan, John Jeffrey Miller, Harold Stanton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
