Cases 11 - 20 of 70
Dambrosia-Shaw v. Wakefield et al
as 4:2022cv01080
Plaintiff:
Zachariah Dambrosia-Shaw
Defendant:
Robert Wakefield, M Dukes and Bowers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawson v. Wakefield et al
as 4:2022cv01079
Plaintiff:
Mallory Lawson
Defendant:
Robert Wakefield, M Dukes and Bowers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hales v. Wakefield et al
as 4:2022cv01078
Plaintiff:
Nathan Hale and Nathan Hales
Defendant:
Robert Wakefield, M Dukes and Bowers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Dukes et al
as 4:2022cv00884
Plaintiff:
Christopher D Johnson
Defendant:
Dukes, Martin, Dorado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duke v. Lagasse Construction Inc et al
as 3:2022cv00240
Plaintiff:
Donald G Duke, Jr
Defendant:
Lagasse Construction Inc, Snider Industries LLC, Smith-Doyle Contractors Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
James v. Dukes et al
as 4:2022cv00767
Plaintiff:
David Nicholas James
Defendant:
B Dukes, Johnson, Barbria Elmore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bethune v. Scott et al
as 4:2022cv00537
Plaintiff:
Joe Bethune
Defendant:
Scott, Dukes and Faulkner County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duke v. Poplar Grove Operations LLC
as 4:2022cv00056
Plaintiff:
Antonio Duke
Defendant:
Poplar Grove Operations LLC doing business as Green House Cottages of Poplar Grove
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Todd v. Faughn et al
as 2:2021cv00125
Plaintiff:
Tylenn Jamar Todd
Defendant:
Brodie Faughn, Mark Duke, Austin Peek and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Davis v. Payne et al
as 4:2020cv00336
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Lisa Smith, Sondra L Parker and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Davis, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
