Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 5,845
McNeil v. Molnar, et al.
as 24-2733
Plaintiff: MICHAEL MCNEIL
Defendant: DAVE MOLNAR, Investigator General, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, WILLIAM GLASS, Sergeant and others
Thomas Mucha, et al v. State of Wisconsin, et al
as 24-1720
Plaintiff: THOMAS MUCHA, Shareholder of Buzz Energies Inc and DIANE K. MUELLER
Appellant: JAMES D. LAMMERS, also known as JAMES D. KURTZ
Defendant: STATE OF WISCONSIN, SHEBOYGAN COUNTY, WISCONSIN, RACINE COUNTY, WISCONSIN and others
USA v. Smith
as 24-40276
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Darnell Dwight Smith
Dwight Alston v. Brandon Watwood
as 24-5406
Petitioner: DWIGHT ALSTON
Respondent: BRANDON WATWOOD, Warden
1816 E. Wood Land Trust, et al v. Buddy Ford
as 24-11282
Plaintiff: 1816 E. WOOD LAND TRUST, ACM TRUST, AEGIS 13TH AVE TRUST and others
Defendant: BUDDY DWIGHT FORD
Dwight Bowen v. Secretary Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-1714
Plaintiff: DWIGHT BOWEN
Defendant: SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DORINA VARNER, KERI MOORE and others
Byrd et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00488
Defendant: 3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff: Robert Byrd, Derek Junior Adams, Jeffrey O'Brien Anglim and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Salvino v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01805
Plaintiff: Garrett Dwight Salvino
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Revill v. Pratz et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv02782
Plaintiff: Monica Revill
Defendant: Erik Pratz, Christan Tate Wegener, Jessica E. Rydzewski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dial v. Dichter et al
as 1:2024cv02648
Plaintiff: Keith Dial
Defendant: Kenneth Dichter, Todd Smith, David Adelman and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?