Cases 11 - 20 of 51
Argonaut Great Central Insurance Company v. City of Gastonia et al
as 3:2019cv00638
Defendant:
Joan A Meinck, Angela Marie Short, Leslie Taylor English and others
Plaintiff:
Argonaut Great Central Insurance Company
Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc. v. BioDelivery Sciences International, Inc.
as 5:2019cv00505
Defendant:
BioDelivery Sciences International, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc.
Interested Party:
McCarter & English, LLP
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Newkirk v. English et al
as 5:2019ct03274
Defendant:
Mark E. Myers, Duplin County Sheriff's Office, County of Duplin and others
Plaintiff:
Darwin Newkirk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WATSON v. ENGLISH et al
as 1:2019cv00945
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS L. WATSON
Defendant:
OFFICER ENGLISH, OFFICER M. JOHNSON and OFFICER COLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Genworth Life and Annuity Insurance Company v. Sheridan et al
as 5:2019cv00338
Defendant:
Ryan C Sheridan, William B Sheridan and Koreen English
Plaintiff:
Genworth Life and Annuity Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALLEN v. JORDAN et al
as 1:2019cv00700
Defendant:
JUANITA ENGLISH, PHILLIP JORDAN and LENIN MARTINEZ-GALLO
Plaintiff:
DERRICK ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
English v. Berryhill
as 1:2019cv00097
Plaintiff:
Keith English
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
English v. Berryhill
as 1:2017cv00200
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Keith English
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Oppenheimer v. Vybe Sunglasses, LLC et al
as 4:2017cv00045
Plaintiff:
David Oppenheimer
Defendant:
Vybe Sunglasses, LLC, James Andrew English and Chase Andrew Denison
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504
Howard v. King et al
as 5:2016ct03266
Plaintiff:
Kenneth D. Howard
Defendant:
Calvin King, James W. McRae, Ms. Locklear and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
