Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv05540
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-1793
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00952
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00739
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv02126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00349
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
John Opoku v. Educational Commission for For, et al
as 13-4076
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN PAUL OPOKU
Defendant - Appellee:
EDUCATIONAL COMMISSION FOR FOREIGN MEDICAL GRADUATES, KIMBERLY GRIFFIN, SUZANNE MARTINEZ and others
TOTAL VIDEO PRODUCTS, INC. v. EDUCATIONAL COMMISSION FOR FOREIGN MEDICAL GRADUATES
as 2:2013cv05600
Plaintiff:
TOTAL VIDEO PRODUCTS, INC.
Defendant:
EDUCATIONAL COMMISSION FOR FOREIGN MEDICAL GRADUATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THOMAS v. UNITED STATES MEDICAL LICENSING EXAMINATION et al
as 2:2013cv03946
Plaintiff:
MATHEW THOMAS, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MEDICAL LICENSING EXAMINATION, NBME - NATIONAL BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS and ECFMG - EDUCATIONAL COMMISSION FOR FOREIGN MEDICAL GRADUATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
LaBlanche v. National Borad of Medical Examiners et al
as 4:2013cv00204
Plaintiff:
Cheri LaBlanche
Defendant:
National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME), Federation of State Medical Boards and Education Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
