Cases 11 - 20 of 116
Frosch v. Cowan et al
as 1:2021cv00211
Plaintiff:
George Edward Harry Frosch
Defendant:
Jeff Cowan, FNU LNU 1:21cv-211-1 and FNU LNU 1:21-CV-211-2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edward Harris v. Tonya Wroble, et al
as 21-2705
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWARD HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
TONYA WROBLE, in her individual capacity and official capacity as a Pennsylvania State Trooper, GARRY HOFFMAN, in his individual and official capacity, MICHAEL SPADA, in his individual capacity and official Capacity as a Corporal with the Pennsylvania State Police and others
HARRIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv46535
Plaintiff:
EDWARD HARRIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Harris
as 21-50738
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jimel Edward Harris
USA v. Mack Harris
as 21-35633
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MACK EDWARD HARRIS
Harris - RESTRICTED - ACCEPT NO FILINGS v. Lawson et al
as 3:2020cv00976
Defendant:
Julie Lawson, Olmstead and Z
Plaintiff:
James Edward Harris, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Forrest Harris v. Corizon, LLC
as 20-3094
Defendant / Appellee:
Corizon, LLC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Forrest Edward Harris
HARRIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv39822
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH EDWARD HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARRIS v. WROBLE et al
as 2:2020cv00915
Defendant:
HOFFMAN KENNELS, MICHAEL SPADA, THOMAS WHARRY and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv31822
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN EDWARD HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
