Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv15416
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Solomon et al v. Macomb County Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv14537
Plaintiff:
Martin Solomon and Anthony Moore
Defendant:
Macomb County Corporation, Sixteenth Judicial Circuit Court, Gus Harrison Correctional Facility and others
Richards v. McKee et al
as 2:2012cv14148
Plaintiff:
Kyle Richards
Defendant:
Ken McKee, Triewiller, Daniel Hienz and others
SMITH v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 3:2012cv00127
Petitioner:
ERIC J. SMITH
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TEDDY-LAWRENCE v. STATE OF MICHIGAN INC., et al
as 1:2010cv01786
Plaintiff:
TEDDY-LAWRENCE
Defendant:
STATE OF MICHIGAN INC., COUNTY OF MACOMB, INC., CITY OF ROSEVILLE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
R. v. FLORIDA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION et al
as 4:2010cv00312
Defendant:
FLORIDA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION, ERIC J SMITH and ORANGE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD
Plaintiff:
D. R.
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
Mason v. Hackel et al
as 1:2010cv12057
Petitioner:
Rodney Mason
Respondent:
Mark A Hackel, Eric J Smith, James Biernat and others
Burnett v. Sperry et al
as 2:2010cv10380
Plaintiff:
Everett Burnett
Defendant:
Donna Sperry, John Doe, Patricia Caruso and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Type:
Other Statutes
E.C. v. The State of Florida Department of Education et al
as 6:2009cv02096
Plaintiff:
E.C. and E.C.
Defendant:
The State of Florida Department of Education, Eric J. Smith and The School Board of Seminole County, Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maldonado v. B & B Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00740
Plaintiff:
Mardoqueo Maldonado
Defendant:
B & B Services, Inc., B & B Services, Inc., Eric J. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
